Legal Opinion
Van Wyhe v. Reisch
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 10, 2009No. 08-1409, 08-1413PublishedCited by 102 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANSEN, Circuit Judge.
James Dean Van Wyhe and Charles E. Sisney, prisoners at the South Dakota State Penitentiary (“SDSP”), each brought a suit against South Dakota prison officials, asserting various claims of interference with their free exercise of religion under the First Amendment and Section 3 of the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 (RLUIPA), 114 Stat. 804, 42 U.S.C. § 2000ce-l(a)(l)-(2). Sisney added two claims of retaliation. The prison officials bring this interlocutory appeal of the district court’s summary judgment rulings. See Van Wyhe v. Reisch, 536…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Turner v. SafleySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by102 opinions
- Sossamon v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Abdulhaseeb v. CalboneCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Victor Santiago v. Daniel BlairCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Mark Bitzan v. Jerry BartruffCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2019
- Holley v. California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
97 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.