Hames v. City of Polson
Montana Supreme Court
1Dissent
MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:
I dissent. There are several propositions advanced in the majority opinion with which I do not agree and the determinative question in the case is not discussed at all. The majority opinion is bottomed upon a proposition not suggested in the briefs or oral argument of counsel and upon an issue not raised by the pleadings. Likewise the opinion, if sound in other respects, does not justify the conclusion reached. In other words, if no valid park board was appointed with power to govern and manage the park, recreational grounds and golf course, then the deed from the Poison…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State ex rel. Wood v. SchweickardtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
- Carey v. GuestMontana Supreme Court · 1927
- Fessler v. Town of UnionNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1903
- Bozarth v. Egg Harbor CityNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1918
- Dineen v. City of ButteMontana Supreme Court · 1928