Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wood v. Schweickardt

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1891PublishedCited by 36 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge. (1) The city of St. Louis holds Forest Park for the beneficial enjoyment of the entire body of its citizens and the public, and any diversion to other than legitimate park purposes is illegal.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Jacob Klein, Judge. (1) The city of St. Louis holds Forest Park for the beneficial enjoyment of the entire body of its citizens and the public, and any diversion to other than legitimate park purposes is illegal. Session Acts of 1874, p. 371; St. Louis Co. v. Gristoold, 58 Mo. 175; Butherford v. Taylor, 38 Mo. 315; Price v. Thompson, 48 Mo. 361; Cummings v. City, 90 Mo. 259; 2 Dillon on Municipal Corporations [4 Ed.] secs. 914-922; Glasgoio v. City, 87 Mo. 678. (2) The liquor business has repeatedly been referred to in judicial decisions as…

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, P. J.

The relator, by this proceeding, prays for an injunction against the defendants, enjoining and restraining them from selling whiskey, wine, liquor or any kind of intoxicating refreshments, in Forest Park; from carrying out the terms and provisions of ordinance number 16002; for a decree declaring said ordinance and the contract made thereunder null and void; for tearing down the cottage, built pursuant to the contract; for the ejection of defendant Sehweiekardt, and for other and further relief. This petition the defendant city answered, setting up certain constitutional, statutory, charter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  2. County Court v. GriswoldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Des Moines Gas Co. v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  4. Ferrenbach v. TurnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1885
  5. Taylor v. City of CarondeletSupreme Court of Missouri · 1855

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Higginson v. Treasurer & School House CommissionersMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912
  2. State ex rel. Crow v. CantySupreme Court of Missouri · 1907
  3. Russell v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Harter v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. State ex rel. National Subway Co. v. St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1898

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API