Legal Opinion

Dineen v. City of Butte

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1928No. 6,341PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myers

This cause is before this court upon an appeal from a judgment, for defendant, rendered upon an order of the trial court, sustaining a demurrer to an amended complaint. Therefore, a question of pleading only is involved.

The cause is one for recovery of compensation for services alleged to have been rendered to defendant by plaintiff, in the alleged, capacity of assistant or deputy city treasurer.

The amended complaint, to which we shall refer as the complaint, alleges the municipal corporate capacity of defendant; that one T. J. McCarthy was city treasurer of defendant; that for many years the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Carey v. GuestMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  2. City of Miles City v. Red KernMontana Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. O'Connor v. McCarthyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Flynn v. Helena Cab & Bus Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Hames v. City of PolsonMontana Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Hames v. City of PolsonMontana Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API