Legal Opinion
Nielson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 12, 1928No. 5021PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiffs in error, together with one Noland Nelson, were charged with conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (27 USCA) and certain revenue statutes of the United States. The charge was dismissed as against Nelson; the others were convicted.
On May 18, 1926, prohibition agents came upon an abandoned lumber camp consisting of a number of shaeks or cabins, an open garage, and a bam. In the garage they found a Buiek touring ear belonging to the defendant Dave Nielson, and a Ford belonging to the defendant Reece, the back seats of both cars being missing. In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Graham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Chicco v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1922
- Tucker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1915
- Cantrell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Connolly v. MedalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Harry Carl Schoeneman v. United States of America, Garlan Euel Markham, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1963
- Shreve v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1939
- Hogan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- United States v. CisnerosDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.