Cantrell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BRYAN, Circuit Judge.
The defendants, Cantrell, Hunnicutt, Kerr, and Johnson, were convicted upon an indictment charging them, in separate counts, with having in their pos session a still for the purpose of distilling' spirits without having first registered the same, with engaging in the business of distillers without giving bond, with carrying on that business with intent to defraud the government of its tax on distilled spirits, and with making mash fit for the distillation of whisky on premises other than a distillery duly authorized by law, all in violation of the requirements of sections…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tritico v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925
- Schwartz v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
3Cited by32 opinions
- Connolly v. MedalieCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1953
- Nathan Shurman and Louis Chebatt v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1955
- Maxwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1963
- United States v. BellDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1955
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.