Legal Opinion

United States v. Cisneros

District Court, N.D. California

Decided February 10, 1961No. Crim. No. 12805PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

HALBERT, District Judge.

Defendant was charged by an indictment with the crime of conspiring to import heroin into the United States, contrary to law, and to conceal and facilitate the concealment and transportation of heroin, knowing that the said heroin had been imported into the United States-contrary to law (Title 21 U.S.C. § 174). Sylvia Poindexter and Arthur Ortiz were-named as co-conspirators, but not as. defendants.

*926Defendant was tried before the Court, •sitting with a jury, and the jury returned a verdict of “guilty.” Defendant has made a motion for a new trial. This motion is now…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Nye & Nissen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Williamson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Herman Roberson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
  5. United States v. BucurCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Portaluppi v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API