Legal Opinion

Harry Carl Schoeneman v. United States of America, Garlan Euel Markham, Jr. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided April 4, 1963No. 17395, 17396PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WRIGHT, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Sehoeneman was a small business procurement specialist in the Navy Department. Appellant Markham was a self-employed manufacturers’ representative for smaller companies seeking Government contracts. In July, 1960, Sehoeneman and Markham formed Washington Procurement Consultants for the purpose of representing small businesses interested in dealing with the United States Government, utilizing Schoeneman’s inside information on Navy procurement. In the course of carrying on this business, Sehoeneman supplied Markham with many classified documents dealing with…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Draper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. McDonald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. United States v. James H. Spikes (96-3899) Marilyn Smith (96-3660)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  2. Samuel Rosencranz v. United States of America, Anthony Dipietro v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
  3. United States v. Calvin D. RahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. Henry Albert SteevesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
  5. State of Iowa v. Union Asphalt & Roadoils, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1968

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API