Legal Opinion

Morris v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 26, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. Where a ground of a motion for a new trial complains of a refusal of the judge to allow a witness to answer certain questions propounded to him on direct examination, the ground raises no question for the consideration of this court *662unless it appears from the ground that at the time of the propounding of the questions counsel for the movant stated to the court what were the answers that he expected from the witness. City of Jackson v. Wilson, 146 Ga. 250 (4), 252 (91 S. E. 63). Furthermore, the ground in the instant case does not show that the questions related to any material issue…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. York v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  2. City of Jackson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Shehany v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
  4. Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Lacey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API