Legal Opinion

Lacey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 17, 1932No. 22055PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBboyles, C. J.

1. An indictment for robbery, which charges that the accused did “wrongfully, fraudulently, and violently, by force and intimidation, take certain money, goods, and chattels, to wit, five hundred and twenty dollars, lawful money and of the value [of] five hundred and twenty dollars, from the person of Park Ford, the owner thereof, without the consent of him, the said Park Ford,” etc., sufficiently charges the offense of robbery, the charge being substantially in the *792language of section 148 of the Penal Code of 1910, defining the offense of robbery. “The word ‘fraudulently,’ in the connection…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Sledge v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Humphries v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  3. Holland v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  4. Maxwell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Highway Department v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
  2. Ramsey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. State v. DelabyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2009
  4. Rutherford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
  5. Morris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API