Holland v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for robbery; from Whitfield superior court — Judge Fite. January 15, 1910.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
There was no merit in the demurrer, to the overruling of which defendant excepted pendente lite. The presentment was - against five defendants, and charged the offense of robbery, alleging that the defendants “did unlawfully, and with force and arms, wrongfully, fraudulently, and violently take from the person of Bob White ten dollars, the property of the said Bob White, without the consent of the owner, by force and intimidation, contrary to the laws of said State, the good order, peace, and dignity thereof.” The demurrer raised the point that the presentment was fatally defective, because…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Butts v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
- Moyers v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Rutherford v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1936
- Shehany v. LowrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1930
- State v. SwitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1914
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.