Legal Opinion
Vane v. Nocella
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 27, 1985No. 34, September Term, 1984PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COLE, Judge.
We granted certiorari in this case to decide whether the trial court erred in finding that the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA or Act), 29 U.S.C.
§§ 151-169 (1982), preempted appellant’s state common law action for tortious interference with contractual relations.
We glean the following facts from the record. Appellant, Milton M. Vane, was employed by H.L. Hartz & Sons (Hartz) as an industrial engineer. In his deposition, appellant explained that his position entailed the regulation of production employees through the establishment of piece rates. Piece rates are incentive rates…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Labor Relations Board v. Bell Aerospace Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Amalgamated Ass'n of Street, Electric Railway & Motor Coach Employees of America v. LockridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sharrow v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- MacKlin v. Robert Logan AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Pemberton v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Kaser v. Financial Protection Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.