Legal Opinion

Polchow v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 8, 1937No. 30,912PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Devanen, Chief Justice.

Action to recover damages for injuries received in a collision.

The defendant Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Company operates and maintains two main line tracks through the city of Mankato, Minnesota. They are crossed at right angles by Given street, one of the public thoroughfares in said city. The southernmost track of these two main line tracks is the eastbound main line track. Fifteen feet south of this east line track measuring from center to center and running approximately parallel to it is a spur track, the north rail of which is 10y2 feet south…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
  3. Perkins v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Willett v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Setosky v. Duluth, South Shore & Atlantic Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Mattfeld v. NesterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Roth v. SwansonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
  3. Ohrmann v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Munkel v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  5. Bryant v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1946

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API