Legal Opinion

Remco S. S. Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 30, 1936No. 7930PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

The petitioners herein seek review of an order determining their income tax liability for’the years 1927 and 1928.

Petitioner Caspar Lumber Company, a California corporation, hereinafter called “Caspar,” during the years 1926, 1927, and 1928, owned all the outstanding stock of petitioner Remco Steamship Company, also a California corporation, hereinafter called “Remco,” and during said years owned slightly less than 95 per cent, of the outstanding common stock of Redwood Manufacturers Company, a Nevada corporation, hereinafter called “Redwood.”

Caspar owned a tract of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Burnet v. Commonwealth Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Woolford Realty Co. v. RoseSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  5. Broadway Strand Theatre Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Estate of Gardner v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1984
  2. Brigham v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1941
  3. Keenan v. BowersDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1950
  4. Union Packing Co. v. RoganDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1937
  5. Chelsea Products, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API