Legal Opinion
Union Packing Co. v. Rogan
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 21, 1937No. 1071PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
YANKWICH, District Judge.
The Revenue Act of 1936, in title 3 (sections 501-506 [26 U.S.C.A. §§ 345-345e]), headed “Tax on Unjust Enrichment,” provides for the collection of taxes on net income from certain specified sources. The taxes to be levied are:
“(1) A tax equal to 80 per centum of that portion of the net income from the sale of articles with respect to which a Federal excise tax was imposed on such person but not paid which is attributable to shifting to others to any extent the burden of such Federal excise tax and which does not exceed such person’s net income for the entire taxable…
2Cases cited71 opinions
- Cohan v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- United States v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Brushaber v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Taylor v. SecorSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- White Packing Co. v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Con-Rod Exchange, Inc. v. HenricksenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1939
- Filipowicz v. RothensiesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Broad Motors Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
- United States v. PownallDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1946