Legal Opinion

Keenan v. Bowers

District Court, E.D. South Carolina

Decided August 15, 1950No. C. A. 2191PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WYCHE, Chief Judge.

This action is brought under the provisions of Section 3772(a) (2) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3772(a) (2), to recover an alleged erroneous assessment of income taxes. This court has jurisdiction of the action under the provisions of Section 24(5), Judicial Code, 28 U.S.CA. § 41(5), New 28 U.S.C.A. § 1340.

On March 15, 1945, the taxpayers, husband and wife, filed a joint federal income tax return for the tax year 1944, and in their computation of net taxable income claimed a deduction of $1,300 under Section 23(e) (3), Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Matheson v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
  4. Bercaw v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
  5. Durden v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. Buist v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1958
  3. Burns v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1959
  4. Tank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  5. Getz v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1965

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API