Crangi Distributing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge Rogers,
This case requires us to interpret new statutory law empowering the Pennsylvania workmen’s compensation authorities to impose penalties upon, and to order the payment of claimants’ attorney’s fees by, employers and their insurance carriers.
The claimant, Roy Nicewonger, was employed as a truck driver-delivery man by Crangi Distributing Company, a small beer distributing firm. The claimant was dissatisfied with his employment, chiefly on account of what he considered to be the poor work habits of other employes and had threatened to quit on a number of occasions. On…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- New Standard Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
3Cited by22 opinions
- Thomas v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Edmond v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Poli v. WORK. COMP. APPEAL BOARDCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Hartman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Banic v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.