Legal Opinion

Santor v. Balnis

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 3, 1964PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtComley, J.

The named plaintiff is a fourteen-year-old boy, who brought this action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered by him when the bicycle which he was riding collided with an automobile driven by the named defendant. At the conclusion of the testimony, the trial court directed a verdict for the defendants, and from the judgment rendered thereon the plaintiffs have appealed to this court.

Directed verdicts are not favored and should be granted only when the jury could not reasonably and legally reach any other conclusion. Bader v. United Orthodox Synagogue, 148 Conn. 449, 455, 172 A.2d…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bader v. United Orthodox SynagogueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Greene v. DiFazioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  3. Johnson v. ShattuckSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  4. Lurier v. Danbury Bus CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Labbee v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Sestito v. City of GrotonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  3. Boehm v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. Bleich v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  5. Console v. NickouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API