Lurier v. Danbury Bus Corporation
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.
This is an action to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been sustained as the result of a collision between the plaintiff’s automobile and the named defendant’s bus. Although both the operator and the owner of the bus were made parties defendant, the operator alone will be referred to as the defendant since the issue of agency was conceded. The court directed a verdict for the defendant and thereafter denied the plaintiff’s motion to set it aside. The plaintiff has appealed.
The power of a trial court to direct a verdict is necessarily sharply circumscribed. “[Ljitigants…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Ardoline v. KeeganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Ferino v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Morris v. King Cole Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Currie v. Consolidated Railway Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1908
- Corey v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- A-G Foods, Inc. v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Lombardi v. J. A. Bergren Dairy Farms, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Bader v. United Orthodox SynagogueSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Pelletier v. BilbilesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
- Emerick v. KuhnConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.