Legal Opinion

Ferrari v. Mambretti

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 22, 1943No. Civ. 12274PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

The plaintiff sued upon an implied contract to pay for the reasonable value of services alleged to have been performed for the decedent David Ferrari under an alleged oral contract to leave the plaintiff one-half of the estate. The cause was tried with a jury upon an amended and supplemental complaint based upon an amended claim filed and rejected; plaintiff had a verdict for $20,000, which was approximately one-half of the appraised value of the estate; on motion for a new trial the trial court reduced the judgment to $12,500. The jury returned its verdict “in favor of Plaintiff Louis…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Spencer v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Long v. RumseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Birkhofer v. KrummCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Nylund v. MadsenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trumbo v. Bank of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Thompson v. HickmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Belletich v. PollockCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Ferrari v. MambrettiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. Lake v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API