Legal Opinion
Ferrari v. Mambretti
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 10, 1945No. Civ. No. 12888PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, J. pro tem.
This appeal is prosecuted by the plaintiff from a judgment dismissing the action. The case was regularly set for trial on November 6, 1944, and the judgment of dismissal was ordered on that date following the statement of plaintiff’s counsel that “I am standing on the grounds that I am not ready to go to trial at this time. ’ ’ It was and is appellant’s position that the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellant’s motion for a continuance of the trial date to January, 1945.
A previous judgment for appellant in the same case was reversed in this court. (Ferrari…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sheldon v. LandwehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Jaffe v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Lynch v. Superior Court of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Johnson v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Mission Film Corp. v. Chadwick Pictures Corp.California Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Beck v. ReinholtzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Oak Knoll Broadcasting Corp. v. HudgingsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Agnew v. LarsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961