Legal Opinion

Petrick v. Martin

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided January 3, 2001No. 99-6399PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAUL KELLY, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Rick Dean Petrick appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his second petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 as untimely under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1). The timeliness of Mr. Pe-trick’s petition depends on whether his first federal habeas petition, part of which was dismissed without prejudice, tolled the running of the statute of limitations under § 2244(d)(2). We hold that a federal habe-as petition does toll § 2244(d)(l)’s limitations period, and therefore reverse and remand for further proceedings.

I

In 1990, Mr. Petrick was convicted…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Rose v. LundySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Cardoza-FonsecaSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Marsh v. SoaresCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  5. Stewart v. Martinez-VillarealSupreme Court of the United States · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Duncan v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Harris v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  3. Woodward v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
  4. Cary Williams v. Timothy FilsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. York v. GaletkaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API