Legal Opinion

Ferreira v. Kamo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1908PublishedCited by 4 opinions

ErrcSr to DistRict Magistrate oe Hamakua, Hawaii.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

WILDER, J.

This is a writ of error brought by plaintiff to review the decision of the district magistrate of Hamalma, Hawaii, in discharging the garnishee in the case.

■On June 4, 1901, plaintiff instituted his action against defendant in the district court of Hamakua, Hawaii,, including in his summons a request to leave a copy thereof with the “Paauhau Sugar Plantation Co. through its manager, James Gibb, garnishee, who is 'the debtor of said defendant or at his usual place of abode and to summon him to appear personally at the time and place named in the summons there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Hudson River Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Howland v. JeuelSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  3. Mercer v. BoobySupreme Court of Florida · 1856
  4. Young Hin v. H. Hackfeld & Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1905

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Tropic Builders, Ltd. v. Naval Ammunition Depot Lualualei Quarters, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Payne v. FurtadoHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Ferreira v. KamoHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Wong Young v. Kum ChongHawaii Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API