Legal Opinion

Wong Young v. Kum Chong

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1917No. 1088PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Acting District Magistrate of Wailuku.

1Per curiam

This is an appeal on points of law from a decision of the district magistrate, the points raised being that the district magistrate erred in sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff’s complaint, said demurrer being on two grounds: First, that summons improperly issued, the complaint containing no prayer for process; and, second, that the complaint is too indefinite and uncertain.

We have no statutory provision requiring complaints in district courts to contain a prayer for the issuance of process. The complaint may be oral (Larrisch v. Schaefer, *966 Haw. 140). Strict rules of pleading do not apply…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Payne v. FurtadoHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Coombs & Powell v. RogersHawaii Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Ferreira v. KamoHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Larrisch v. SchaeferHawaii Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Paris v. VasconcellosHawaii Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Guardianship of CarlsmithHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  2. MacIel v. TellesHawaii Supreme Court · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API