Legal Opinion

Ferreira v. Kamo

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 21, 1908PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to District Magistrate of Hamakua, Hawaii.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

BALLOU. J.

Upon the first trial of this case before the district magistrate of Hamakua, Hawaii, the magistrate discharged the garnishee. Plaintiff brought a writ of error and this court reversed the decision holding that while service on the garnishee was defective the defect was waived by a general appearance by the garnishee through R. H. Makekau, an attorney. Ferreira v. Kamo, 18 Haw. 593. Upon the case being remanded the district magistrate gave judgment against the garnishee for the full amount of the plaintiff’s claim and the garnishee in turn sued out a writ of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foster v. . WoodfinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. Pleyte v. PleyteSupreme Court of Colorado · 1890
  3. Ferreira v. KamoHawaii Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Ferreira v. KamoHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. TaylorHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Ferreira v. KamoHawaii Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API