Legal Opinion

Young Hin v. H. Hackfeld & Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1905PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Writ of Error to the District Magistrate of Hamakua, Island of Hawaii.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

HARTWELL, J.

The record of the district magistrate of Hamakua shows that on April 15, 1904, he rendered judgment for the plaintiff in an action on a note for $273.15 by H. Hackfeld & Co., Ltd., v. Kwong Yick Company defendants and Young Hin and twenty-one others named as “No. 5 Gang” as garnishees. The summons was issued on the printed form in use for many years styled “Garnishee Summons,’’containing a request that the court insert in the summons a direction to the officer to leave a true and attested copy with the garnishees, summoning them to appear, etc., and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. de Frag v. AdamsHawaii Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. FurtadoHawaii Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Ferreira v. KamoHawaii Supreme Court · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API