Legal Opinion
State v. Day
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 15, 1993No. C1-92-1650PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FORSBERG, Judge.
This appeal is from a judgment of conviction of fourth degree criminal sexual conduct. Minn.Stat. § 609.345, subd. 1(h) (1990). We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Dr. Roger Day was in a psychiatric residency program at the Universi ty of Minnesota in 1990. In the spring of 1990, J.H., a woman suffering from depression, was referred to Day for psychotherapy. Day counseled J.H. for nearly a year, until the incident on March 20, 1991 which is the basis for the criminal charges against him.
J.H. testified that on March 20 they had a therapy session at her house because she could not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schad v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. DanielsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- State v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. IhleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
- People of Guam, Plaintiff-Appellee/Cross-Appellant v. Renato Capili Bosi, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-AppelleeSupreme Court of Guam · 2022
- State v. StempfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- State v. EnyeartCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.