Legal Opinion

State v. Enyeart

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 23, 2004No. A03-360PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Randall Enyeart was convicted for knowingly filing fraudulent tax returns, willfully evading income taxes, and intentionally evading motor-vehicle taxes, on the theory that he sought to avoid taxation by fraudulently creating the appearance that he was a resident of Alaska. On appeal from the judgment of conviction, Enyeart challenges the constitutionality of Minn. R. 8001.0300 (2001), the propriety of the jury instructions, the determination that federal law does not preempt Minnesota’s method of calculating days spent in the state, and the admission of Minn. R.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Dunham v. RoerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. RomineCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008
  3. Enyeart v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2006
  4. State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne HenselCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
  5. Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API