Legal Opinion

Cummings v. Cummings

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 21, 1929No. Docket No. 6117PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAIL, J., pro tem.

The first cause of action set up in the complaint is one to recover on a judgment of the supreme court of the state of New York granting to the wife $65 per week for the support of herself and her two children. And appellant sets out four errors in regard thereto which he claims entitle him to a reversal.

It is first contended that “plaintiff’s complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, as all material allegations of the complaint are based upon information and belief and further that paragraphs IX and X of the first cause of action of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  2. Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
  4. Fanchier v. GammillMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Jacob v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API