Cummings v. Cummings
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
CRAIL, J., pro tem.
The first cause of action set up in the complaint is one to recover on a judgment of the supreme court of the state of New York granting to the wife $65 per week for the support of herself and her two children. And appellant sets out four errors in regard thereto which he claims entitle him to a reversal.
It is first contended that “plaintiff’s complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, as all material allegations of the complaint are based upon information and belief and further that paragraphs IX and X of the first cause of action of the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Barber v. Barber Ex Rel. CronkhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
- Sistare v. SistareSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Soule v. SouleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Fanchier v. GammillMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- Jacob v. LorenzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Worthley v. WorthleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.