Legal Opinion

Savannah R-III School District v. Public School Retirement System

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 24, 1995No. WD 50584PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This dispute concerns whether any fringe benefits should be included in the “salary rate” of members of the Public School Retirement System when it calculates their retirement benefits. PSRS wants to include the value of what its members’ employers pay for health insurance or annuities in lieu of health insurance, but not other fringe benefits. The school districts contend that an employee’s salary rate should not include any fringe benefits. We agree with the school districts.

PSRS administers the retirement fund for Missouri’s public school teachers. The General Assembly established the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hilligoss v. LaDowIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Robert Anthony Reed, III v. Cleveland Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1978
  3. Jahn v. City of WoodstockAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  4. State Ex Rel. City of Manitowoc v. Police Pension BoardWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Frazier v. City of RichmondCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Public School Retirement System v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  2. Savannah R-III School District v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  3. Public School Retirement System v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Public School Retirement System v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  5. Savannah R-III School District v. Public School Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API