Public School Retirement System v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1DissentBye, Circuit Judge
I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority opinion that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) does not prohibit our review of the district court’s remand order. I further support the majority’s application of our arm-of-the-state factors under the Eleventh Amendment immunity test to determine whether the Retirement Systems are arms of the State of Missouri as they relate to this litigation. However, because my *834weighing of these factors leads me to conclude the Retirement Systems are citizens for diversity jurisdiction purposes, I would reach the merits of the forum-selection clause question.
I
As an…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.