Legal Opinion · Dissent

Public School Retirement System v. State Street Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2011No. 10-1244, 10-2674Published

1DissentBye, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority opinion that 28 U.S.C. § 1447(d) does not prohibit our review of the district court’s remand order. I further support the majority’s application of our arm-of-the-state factors under the Eleventh Amendment immunity test to determine whether the Retirement Systems are arms of the State of Missouri as they relate to this litigation. However, because my *834weighing of these factors leads me to conclude the Retirement Systems are citizens for diversity jurisdiction purposes, I would reach the merits of the forum-selection clause question.

I

As an…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Fitzpatrick v. BitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Moor v. County of AlamedaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Regents of University of California v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Hess v. Port Authority Trans-Hudson CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API