Legal Opinion
Bobryk v. Durand Glass Manufacturing Co.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 29, 2014No. Civil No. 12-5360 (NLH)(JS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HILLMAN, District Judge.
Before the Court is plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification for a collective action pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), and motion for class certification pursuant to Rule 23 regarding their New Jersey state law wage claims. For reasons explained below, plaintiffs’ motion for conditional certification will be granted, and their motion for class certification will be denied without prejudice.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs are current or former employees of defendant Durand Glass Manufacturing Company. (“Durand”). Durand is a producer of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Comcast Corp. v. BehrendSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Genesis HealthCare Corp. v. SymczykSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- In Re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Abraham v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2017
- DING v. BAUMGART RESTAURANT, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Kimberly Dotson, Jennifer Connor, and Amanda McConnell, individually, and on behalf of other similarly situated v. TZ Insurance Solutions, LLC d/b/a TransactDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2026
- LI v. CHINESE BODY WORKS, INCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020