Rutherford v. Berick
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
The first amended complaint alleged two causes of action: first, the breach of an oral contract by which plaintiff was employed to find a purchaser ready, able and willing to purchase a business known as “Brothers Tavern,” and secondly, an alleged promise of both the seller and buyer defendants to pay plaintiff a broker’s commission. The court granted a nonsuit on the second cause of action, and a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against the seller, defendant Berick • (hereinafter referred to as defendant), for a commission on the sale of the tavern.
Two points are raised on this appeal: (1)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Estate of RuleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- McCluskey v. WareCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Haigler v. DonnellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Palmtag v. DanielsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Backman v. Guadalupe Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Rose v. HunterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Meherin v. MeherinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Reid v. JohnsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Hodges v. PorikosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Fadel v. SlaymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.