Legal Opinion

Hodges v. Porikos

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 28, 1948No. Civ. No. 13740PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant.

There are two causes of action. In the first, plaintiff, who is the executor of the will of James A. Nicholson, deceased, alleged that on or about February 24, 1945, defendant borrowed $10,000 from the deceased, which he failed to pay on demand. The second cause of action alleges that on or about the same date defendant received from the deceased $10,000 *239for the purpose of investing it in certain real property, to be held in the name of defendant but for the use and benefit of decedent. No evidence was introduced under the second cause…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Herbert v. LankershimCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Adkins v. BrettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Reese v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Estate of EmersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Freeland v. Jewel Tea Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Lake v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API