Legal Opinion

Fadel v. Slayman

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1949No. Civ. No. 3744Published

1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment rendered in favor of defendants in an action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiff, a licensed contractor entered into an oral agreement with defendants Victor Slayman and Jennie Slay-man to construct a residence and garage on property of the defendants in the city of Lindsay. Plaintiff alleged that under the agreement he was to furnish all material and labor necessary to build the buildings; that the defendants agreed to pay the cost of labor and materials, plus 15 per cent as plaintiff’s *414fee; that the cost, plus 15 per cent, was of the current market…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Rutherford v. BerickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API