Legal Opinion
United States v. Roger P. Reetz
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided March 10, 1994No. 93-2602PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
Roger P. Reetz appeals his 41-month sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to five separate crimes. He raises four issues relating to his sentence. Reetz argues that the district court: (1) violated the ex post facto clause by not applying the Sentencing Guidelines in effect at the time he completed his first crime, (2) engaged in double counting by improperly grouping his multiple offenses, (3) improperly refused to grant an “acceptance of responsibility” adjustment to his offense level, and (4) engaged in double counting by enhancing his offense level for both “more…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Steven C. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Basil G. GeorgiadisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- United States v. SeligsohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Dennis Allen WerlingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- United States v. Michael Jerome Zimmer, United States of America v. James Clarence Stoltz, United States of America v. Aaron Dale CarverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Willard Makes Room for Them, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Arlie D. Maggard, United States of America v. Daisy Dawn Maggard, United States of America v. Timothy J. MaggardCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. BarkerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Cornelius Maxim, Jr., Also Known as CorkeyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.