Legal Opinion
United States v. Seligsohn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 9, 1992No. Nos. 91-2083, 91-2093, 921038 and 91-2100PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
WEIS, Circuit Judge.
In this white collar crime case, the district court imposed imprisonment terms and directed payment of substantial sums in restitution to unidentified consumer victims, as well as to certain named victims. Because the district court used the current Sentencing Guidelines for some of the counts rather than those in effect- on the dates of the offenses, we must remand for recalculation. In addition, findings on some aspects of the restitution orders are lacking and, consequently, we must remand that portion of the case as well.
Defendants, Melvin…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Hughey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. John W. McDowell Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. Richard P. Console, United States of America v. Morton Markoff, D.O., United States of America v. Edward C. CurcioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Willie James Blake, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- United States v. Daryl Lonard Parker, A/K/A Daryl Lenard Parker, A/K/A Junior Parker, A/K/A Jr Parker, A/K/A Jr, Daryl Lonard ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.