Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. Carraro
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 20, 1963No. Civ. 20033, 21214PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAgee, J.
Defendants appeal from the judgment in this eminent domain action fixing the amount of $48,200 as the compensation to be paid for the taking of their property. Defendants also appeal from the order denying their motion to set aside said judgment.
William Steinberg and Abraham Berry were the attorneys of record for appellants and John J. Taheny, Jr., Deputy City Attorney, appeared for respondent. Hereafter the attorneys will be referred to by their last names.
The main issue on this appeal is whether, after a number of continuances, the trial court erred in proceeding to trial on October 24,…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Capital National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Brock v. FouchyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Hearne v. De YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Alferitz v. CahenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Buckert v. BriggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Au-Yang v. BartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Conway v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Conway v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- People Ex Rel. San Francisco Bay Conservation & Development Commisson v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.