Sherman Paper Products Corp. v. Sorg Paper Co.
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
LEVIN, District Judge.
The defendant, The Sorg Paper Company, moves to dismiss this patent infringement action on the ground that the venue requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1400 are not present. The pleadings .and moving affidavits disclose the following facts pertinent to the motion.
The plaintiff, Sherman Paper Products Corporation, is organized under the laws of the State of Massachusetts and the defendant is an Ohio corporation, having its principal place of business in Middletown, Ohio. The defendant solicits orders in Michigan for its products through a manufacturer’s agent, Protect-O-Pae…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Shelton v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Ronson Art Metal Works, Inc. v. Brown & Bigelow, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1952
- Latini v. RM Dubin CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1950
- Kerr v. Port Huron Sulphite and Paper Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1957
3Cited by11 opinions
- Watsco, Inc. v. Henry Valve CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- Brevel Products Corp. v. H & B AMERICAN CORPORATIONDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- McGah v. VM CORPORATIONDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1958
- Stiegele v. Jacques Kreisler Manufacturing Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1962
- Tour Tech. Software, Inc. v. RTV, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.