Martin v. Ray

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from an order amending a judgment nunc pro tunc. Appellants contend that the amendment was a correction of a judicial error, and therefore the court did not have power to so amend the judgment. Respondent Garden Land Company, Ltd., asserts that it was a correction of a clerical error, and therefore the court had powér to make the amendment.

Plaintiffs sought relief against defendants Frederick Ray and Mary Louise Ray by reason of the alleged violation by said defendants of certain restrictions affecting real property. In the same complaint they also sought…