Legal Opinion
Zisk v. City of Roseville
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 20, 1976No. Civ. 15121PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PARAS, J.
Judgment was entered dismissing plaintiffs' complaint which alleged a first cause of action for inverse condemnation and a second cause of action for violation of the federal Civil Rights Act; this judgment was subsequently set aside; judgment was thereafter entered dismissing again the second cause of action and abating (by interlocutory judgment) the first cause of action (because of a prior condemnation action pending).
Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment of dismissal of the second cause of action. They contend that a cause of action was stated under the federal Civil Rights…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Brown v. Western R. Co. of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Selby Realty Co. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Salton Bay Marina, Inc. v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Electronic Equipment Express, Inc. v. Donald H. Seiler & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Ferraro v. CamarlinghiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Bowden v. GreenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Ogborn v. City of LancasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.