Legal Opinion

State v. Kiekhefer

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 23, 1997No. 96-2052-CRPublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

Scott Kiekhefer appeals from a judgment of conviction for possession of THC (marijuana) with intent to deliver in violation of § 161.41(lm)(h), Stats., 1993-94. Judgment was entered after Kiekhefer pled no contest. On appeal, Kiekhefer maintains that the trial court erred when it denied his motion to suppress statements made to the police prior to receiving his Miranda 1 warnings, the physical evidence obtained therefrom and his subsequent written statement. We hold, and the State concedes, that Kiekhefer's unwarned statements must be suppressed. We further conclude that those unwarned…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. State v. HughesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  2. State v. ArticWisconsin Supreme Court · 2010
  3. State v. SykesWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. TrecrociCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  5. State v. TriggsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API