State v. Triggs
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.
¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order suppressing inculpatory statements the trial court held were not the voluntary product of a free and unconstrained will because the police misrepresented that there were several witnesses to the incident. Police misrepresentations during an interrogation do not make an otherwise voluntary statement inadmissible, but become one factor in the totality of the circumstances analysis that must be conducted in determining the voluntary nature of the statement. Since we conclude that under the totality of the circumstances the statement was…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Frazier v. CuppSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State Ex Rel. Goodchild v. BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- United States v. Francisca Rosa VelasquezCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Daniel Holland v. Kenneth McGinnis Warden, and Michael P. Lane, Director, Illinois Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Brendan Dassey v. Michael DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
- State v. WardWisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. Raheem MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. LemoineWisconsin Supreme Court · 2013
- Brendan Dassey v. Michael DittmannCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.