Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Frick

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 30, 1986No. B008199PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

The appellant and cross-respondent, Jerome Frick, and the respondent and cross-appellant, Hiroko Frick, appeal from the trial court’s interlocutory judgment of dissolution of marriage. The parties raise numerous issues in challenging the trial court’s determinations concerning property division, spousal support, and attorney’s fees.

Statement of Facts and Proceedings Below

Jerome and Hiroko met in the latter part of 1966 at the Mikado Hotel and Restaurant, owned and operated by Jerome and his then wife, Yoko. Hiroko was also married at the time.

Jerome and Hiroko began to date…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re Marriage of LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  5. In Re Marriage of MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. In Re the Marriage of HiginbothamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Lucy v. CochranCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Drayton v. DraytonSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  5. Geraci v. GeraciCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API