Legal Opinion
In Re the Marriage of Higinbotham
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 29, 1988No. A038255PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POCHÉ, J.
I. Introduction
Maurice Higinbotham (Maurice) and Delois Higinbotham (Delois) appeal and cross-appeal, respectively, from a judgment disposing of their property upon dissolution of their marriage. Maurice contends that the court erred in (1) treating partly as community property a house he bought before marriage; (2) failing to treat as his separate property the increased value of his disability retirement benefits resulting from their tax exempt status; and (3) requiring him to pay a portion of Delois’s attorneys fees. Delois contests these points and asserts in her…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Ginns v. SavageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- In Re Marriage of StenquistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- See v. SeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- HUONG QUE, INC. v. LuuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- City of Hollister v. Monterey InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Ciprari v. Ciprari (In re Ciprari), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- Overhill Farms, Inc. v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.