Pennington County Bank v. Bauman
Nebraska Supreme Court
Rehearing of case Reported in 85 Neb. 226.
1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.
This case has been reargued and submitted on a motion for a rehearing, and will be treated as though a rehearing had been granted. Por a statement of the facts, about which there is no dispute, reference may be had to our former opinion (85 Neb. 226), by which we reversed the judgment of the district court and remanded the cause for further proceedings.
Plaintiff contends that our former decision was wrong and that the judgment of the district court should have been affirmed. It is argued that the judgment -in the replevin suit, in which the bond sued on in this action was given, is a bar to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Snyder v. YatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
- Garber v. Palmer, Blanchard & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1896
- Ahlman v. Meyer & SchurmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1886
- Campbell v. CroneNebraska Supreme Court · 1880
- Reid, Murdoch & Co. v. PanskaNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Newsum v. HoffmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. SutherlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
- Smith v. BrooksNebraska Supreme Court · 1951
- Capitol Stores, Inc. v. Storms-Green Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- Globe Grain & Milling Co. v. De Tweede Northwestern & Pacific HypotheekbankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.