Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Yates

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 22 opinions

FROM HICKMAN. Appeal from tlie Chancery Court of Hickman County. —J. W. Stout, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

This case presents a contest between a mortgagee and attaching creditors of one Meixsell with respect to cer*311tain mules and sawmill machinery. The attaching creditors established their right to priority before the chancellor, and his decree has been affirmed by the court of chancery appeals.. .The facts fonnd by the court of chancery appeals, so fan as necessary to be stated, are that Meixsell executed a chattel mortgage to Snyder upon the mules and machinery in question. It was acknowledged before Strick-lin, a justice of the peace of Saline county, Illinois, and was recorded by John B. Lee…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harrison v. SterrySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  2. Eyre v. JacobSupreme Court of Virginia · 1858
  3. Donald & Co. v. HewittSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
  4. Corbett v. LittlefieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  5. State v. RussellSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1847

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Bank of Atlanta v. FretzTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Sloan v. JonesTennessee Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Newsum v. HoffmanTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Consolidated Garage Co. v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. SutherlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API