Campbell v. Crone
Nebraska Supreme Court
This was an action of replevin brought in the county court of York county by Crone against Campbell, deputy sheriff, who had possession of the property by virtue of an order of attachment issued in a suit wherein one Striekler was plaintiff and .said Crone was defendant. Crone claimed that the property was exempt from execution and attachment under the laws of this state.
Read the full summary
This was an action of replevin brought in the county court of York county by Crone against Campbell, deputy sheriff, who had possession of the property by virtue of an order of attachment issued in a suit wherein one Striekler was plaintiff and .said Crone was defendant. Crone claimed that the property was exempt from execution and attachment under the laws of this state. Campbell, by a special appearance, “appearing for the purpose of this motion only and for no other purpose,” moved to dismiss the cause for want of jurisdiction, which motion being sustained, Campbell moved for a judgment…
1Opinion of the CourtKike, J.
As this case now stands, several of the matters discussed by counsel are not involved in the real questions raised by the petition in error, wherein the only complaint is, although expressed in three different forms, that the finding and judgment of the district court are against the weight of'evidence and the law of the case. For instance, the dismissal of the action by the county court for want of jurisdiction, although doubtless erronoous, was not objected to by Crone, who alone had the right to complain of it. Campbell certainly had no right to complain of an order which he had moved, nor…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Norwest Bank Nebraska, N.A. v. BowersNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
- Schroeder v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- Pennington County Bank v. BaumanNebraska Supreme Court · 1910
- Burnham v. BennisonNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- State ex rel. Savage v. LettonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.