Legal Opinion

Newsum v. Hoffman

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1911PublishedCited by 24 opinions

FROM SHELBY. . Appeal from tbe Chancery Court of Shelby County.— Francis Fentress, Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The bill states the following facts;

In January, 1910, one C. E. Goza conveyed to com*371plainant Newsum, trustee for Self & Hawkins, two mules to secure a debt. All of these persons were residents of Quitman county, Miss., and the mules were also thére when the trust deed was executed. This instrur ment provided that- the mortgagor should retain possession of the property until default made. Default was made in the payment of the debt, and after that time Goza, on the 6th day of December, 1910, without the knowledge or consent of the trustee, or of the beneficiaries under the trust deed, conveyed…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hornthal v. . BurwellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891
  2. Shapard v. HynesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1900
  3. Hughes v. AbstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. MorrisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  5. Snyder v. YatesTennessee Supreme Court · 1903

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Bank of Atlanta v. FretzTexas Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Cable Piano Co. v. LewisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  3. Bankers' Finance Corp. v. Locke & Massey Motor Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  4. J. T. Fargason Co. v. BallTennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Metro Plan, Inc. v. Kotcher-Turner, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API