Legal Opinion

Taylor v. Casey

District Court, D. Kansas

Decided January 23, 2002No. 00-1448-JTMPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MARTEN, District Judge.

This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment in their favor on all of plaintiffs claims against them. The motion is fully briefed and ripe for determination. For the reasons set forth below, the defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part.

I. Statement of Uncontroverted Fact

During the period from January 1969 to April 1992, plaintiff worked as a staff representative for the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers, AFL-CIO (“IUE”). In April of 1992, he left the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Marvin D. Baker v. The Board of Regents of the State of Kansas and University of Kansas Medical School--School of MedicineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
  4. Dayton Hudson Corp. v. Macerich Real Estate Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
  5. Bergstrom v. NoahSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. Luther Ex Rel. LutherDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  2. Estate of Hammers v. Douglas Cnty.District Court, D. Kansas · 2018
  3. Fitzwater v. University of KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  4. Harris v. City Cycle Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2022
  5. PHH Mortgage Corporation v. StuberDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API